Season 2

2021-06-10 · 28m

This episode argues that the “Big Wireless” industry (especially 5G and cellular technology companies) operates with insufficient independent safety testing and excessive influence from government regulators and telecom corporations. It claims that agencies like the FCC are “captured” by industry interests, that health risks from electromagnetic radiation are being downplayed or ignored, and that public policy has been shaped more by corporate profit than by precautionary science.

2021-10-08 · 28m

The episode presents a critical narrative arguing that major oil companies (“Big Oil”) evolved from early monopolies like Standard Oil, and that powerful industrial, financial, and political interests shaped global energy systems in ways that suppressed alternatives and influenced governments, media, and technology development. It extends this idea into the present, suggesting that oil corporations continue to wield significant influence over climate policy, geopolitics, and emerging technologies, while framing environmental efforts as potentially conflicted or co-opted by the same interests.

2021-10-15 · 23m

The episode argues that modern medicine is heavily shaped by powerful pharmaceutical companies and philanthropic foundations (often grouped as “Big Pharma”), claiming that early 20th-century reforms led by figures like Rockefeller, Carnegie, and the Flexner Report centralized medical education, reduced alternative practices, and promoted drug-based treatments. It also suggests that organizations such as the AMA, along with later actors like the Gates Foundation, have significant influence over global health policy in ways critics say may prioritize industry interests over patient autonomy and alternative medical approaches.

2021-10-22 · 27m

The episode argues that modern industrial agriculture and genetically engineered foods are controlled by a small network of powerful corporations and foundations, which it claims have shaped farming systems to maximize profit while concentrating control over seeds, chemicals, and regulation. It also suggests that GMOs, pesticides, and global food policy may pose environmental and health risks and could be used as tools of economic or political influence, while noting that mainstream science generally considers these technologies safe and beneficial.